ProfilerPlus Random Match Probability Calculator
Information Page

The Profiler Plus Calculations Site can be used to calculate a Random Match Probability for a ProfilerPlus DNA typing profile for any database that has been added to this site. If you wish to add a database to this page, feel free to contact the WebMaster. It is as easy as typing up a small text file of the allele frequencies.

Calculations: The heterozygote calculation for each loci is a straight Mendelian calculation of  2pq. Homozygotes are calculated as per NRC 2 [1] in the form of p2+(p*(1-p)*Ø)   where Ø is the correction for population substructure.  Theta is used as 0.01 for most larger databases and 0.03 for the smaller, isolated databases.

The Random Match Probability (RMP)  is then calculated as the product of the nine ProfilerPlus loci frequencies. Cofiler allele frequencies are NOT available for databases marked with *.

Database Counts: The databases are made up from the following quantity of individuals:

RCMP Combined Caucasian : 79 from Edmonton, 85 from Vancouver = 164 persons (328 allele counts)
RCMP Northern Ontario Aboriginal: 129 persons (258 allele counts), 128 for Cofiler.
RCMP Saskatchewan Aboriginal: 105 persons (210 allele counts), 104 for Cofiler.
RCMP Salishan (BC) Aboriginal: 104 persons (208 allele counts)
RCMP Japanese : 113 from Kyoto region and 59 from Aomori region = 173 individuals (346 allele count)
RCMP Texas African-American: 151 from Fort Worth Texas region (302 allele count)
CFS = Centre of Forensic Sciences, Toronto, Ontario
CFS Caucasian: 293 individuals (586 allele count)
CFS African-American: 179 individuals (358 allele caount)
CFS Asian: 195 individuals (390 allele count)
CFS East Indian: 167 individuals (334 allele count)
ABD-Caucasian 200*: persons (400 allele counts)
ABD-African-American*: 195 persons  (390 allele counts)

To Enter the Data:

To see the raw database information and allele frequency tables, click here.

References:

[1] The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence, NRC,
      National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1996, Page 5, Recommendation 4.1